niomfilter.blogg.se

Combining Capture One with tools like Topaz Denoise forces you to break up your workflow, because you have to change file format when entereing Topaz Denoise to TIFF or even DNG.

Noise reduction within the program is a bit better than in Capture NX-D, but not the best either.

quite irrititaing for someine like me who is used to organize my workflow and imagae management simply based on directories, naming conventions and keywords in the exported JPG's.

I find the way Capture One tries to "simplify" the workflow and forcing you into their philosophy of catalogues, sessions etc.

Two things made me finally move away from it and change to DxO PhotoLab 4: Reason was that someone here in the forum said that the Nikon-Only version would work with the native RAW file interpretation from Nikon, which turned out to be wrong. Because I missed the selective processing options that Capture NX2 lost due to the license issue with Nik Software I decided to check out Capture One.

Any thrid party software I know up to now ignores parts of the RAW file informartion, like in-camera settings, AF point or such alike.

I have used purely Nikon software in the past because of their superior way they interprete the NEF files.